LES ANNALES DES MINES
Responsabilité
& Environnement n°51 July 2008
FOR OUR
ENGLISH-SPEAKING
READERS
|
Editorial
The
frequent implication of new (or transformed) pathogens, the unexpected
occurrence of something unpredictable, the existence of an animal host
or
vector (an independent variable with its own “logic”), the seriousness
of the
disease, its economic and social impact, human reactions (technological
or
behavioral) — these often overlapping factors account for the outbreak
of a new
illness or the resurgence of a familiar one.
Three
phenomena come into play in the outbreak of new illnesses: knowledge of
the
causes, the “globalization” of disease agents and of their vectors
(mosquitos,
ticks, etc.), and the variability of microbes.
The
fight against disease agents has not yet reached an end; new ones will
always
crop up. Their incidence will be limited thanks to: a stability in
health and
social policies, a continuity in decision-making, the transparency and
facility
of relations between local and centralized authorities, scientific and
technical
know-how and the determination to increase it, the improvement of
working
conditions, and cooperation inside national as well as international
networks.
According
to this former cabinet member, a major health emergency is inevitable,
and our
Internet society with its rumors and media is much less prepared than
during a
more authoritarian era. A crisis will entail a frenetic quest for
information,
and we will have to be courageous enough to accept information that
contradicts
ideologies, doctrines and standard procedures.
Improving
the population’s health has always been a priority used to justify
development
programs. Nowadays, development, by altering the climate, seriously
threatens
health. It is necessary to reduce the effects of the underway climate
change
and find the means for adapting as best possible thanks to a
specifically human
quality: cultural adaptability. The question of infectious diseases
must be
placed in its general — bioclimatic, socioeconomic and
political —
setting.
There
is no equivalent in the world to the creation, maintenance and
extension of the
Pasteur Institute’s network. Why? In the beginning, Louis Pasteur’s
prestige sufficed
to explain why the first establishments were set up. Since their
motivation was
to render service to the host country, the establishments in this
network have
continued operations regardless of political circumstances.
For
the first time in history, the possibility exists of controlling
epidemics at
the source if the necessary means are used, as proven by the SARS
outbreak
(Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome). However this possibility should
not be
interpreted as a warrant of success. It turned out to be rather easy to
control
SARS by isolating patients — an action that would not be possible
during a flu
pandemia. Interventions have to be based on epidemiological studies
grounded on
ever improved observations. |
Ecosystems, entomology and the fight
against disease vectors As
experience has proven, controlling illnesses borne by vectors is seldom
achieved through a single approach, whether by fighting against the
vectors,
their hosts or pathogenic agents. Only an integrated approach is
realistic. New
knowledge and technology provide us with exceptional opportunities for
making a
great leap forward in coping with targeted vectors in a way that
respects the
environment and is accepted by the population.
No one
can remain indifferent to the fact that,
despite the efforts and means used, more than a third of the population
on the
islands of
In
February 2006, the French prime minister decided to set up a
multidisciplinary
unit of scientists, headed by the author of this article, from various
disciplines (clinicians, virologists, immunologists, statisticians,
epidemiologists, sociologists, entomologists, veterinaries) for
coordinating
research on Chikungunya fever in
National
and international veterinary services have learned from the health
crisis and
economic problems caused by bird flu and its risk of reaching pandemic
proportions. They have carried the day by imposing the idea of a global
approach to animal health.
The
future of International Health Regulations and, consequently, of
international
health safety now depends on the ability of countries to pursue, with
WHO’s
technical support, the mobilization that made the overhaul of the IHR
possible.
All
organizations must be prepared to carry on with their activities and
protect
wage-earners during an influenza epidemic. The organization’s or firm’s
sense
of social responsibility, its ethics and the continuity of its economic
activities are at stake. Information is now available in printed
material and
through work groups, such as the French PCA club. |
|
|