LES ANNALES DES MINES
Responsabilité
& Environnement n°49 January 2008
FOR OUR
ENGLISH-SPEAKING
READERS
|
How to define urban
sprawl? Can public policies deal with it? Urban sprawl results when an
urban
area expands faster than population growth, the
latter thus
separated from land use. In
Two
energy-hungry sectors — transportation and the building industry —
produce
increasing volumes of greenhouse gases. Their continued growth alters
behavior
patterns and leads to uses if natural resources that complicate
carrying out an
ambitious policy for attenuating global warming and adapting to
climatic
change. Tomorrow’s cities must face a twofold challenge: improve
energy
efficiency and shift to a scale “within reach” so as to limit trips and
deter
land wastage. But the efforts to reduce or prevent the negative impact
of urban
areas on the environment must take into account the economic and social
factors
that could impede them.
In June 2005, the
CO2
emissions from buildings amounted to 34% of total emissions worldwide
in 2002.
Reducing them is, everywhere, a major issue in the coming decades even
as
urbanization continues. These emissions — studies agree about this for
OECD
lands — could sharply decrease under correct economic conditions and
with the
help of proven techniques available in the market. Despite tougher
regulations
for new buildings, emissions are still rising. Among the many
obstructions to
improvements are the operation of the marketplace and the behavior of
individual decision-makers. For this reason, quite diversified means
have to be
used: information, education, tax and financial incentives,
regulations, labels
and a more dynamic supply thanks to companies that provide
energy-related
services. An inventory and proposals…
Producing water of
a good quality while preserving this resource is essential to any urban
policy
of sustainable development. A second objective, which could amount to
more than
a token success, is to boost the consumption of water drawn from the
faucet. From
Climatic change and
the environment have hit the headlines. They figure among the major
issues,
which we must address, but they are also presented as a solution to
globalization, to economic problems or even to our society’s “crisis of
meaning” and of “civility”. For many cities, this is the opportunity to
review
prospects and buttress the political platforms of elected officials.
What about
the towns where climatic and environmental changes imply unattainable
goals or
even entail a decline? Reactions from Antwerpen, the “first French
port” in
terms of freight, and from Big cities and
water: Institutional economics Rampant
urbanization is multiplying the number of big cities in the
Half the world’s
population is becoming urban. Two out of three inhabitants in lands
around the
Mediterranean already live in urban areas; and this figure will be
three out of
four by 2030. Managing accelerated urbanization on the southern and
eastern
shores, satisfying the needs arising out of this trend, controlling
urban
sprawl on the northern shore, limiting the concentration in major
agglomerations, curtailing the growth of inequality, damping the
exposure to
environmental risks: these are the major issues raised by urban
development in
the Mediterranean basin during the 21st century. As experiments have
shown,
cities can contribute to sustainable development. The future will
depend on
policies applied in the field, at the level of agglomerations, in
downtown
areas, in neighborhoods… but also on support from regions and states
and on
international cooperation.
|
The risk of
flooding Model-makers in
climatology predict increasing rainfall in the winter, a higher
frequency of
exceptional events and flooding in estuaries. Who is calling for this
problem
to be placed on the political agenda? The recent “Grenelle of the
Environment”, which assembled officials and
organizations for a wide-ranging
discussion of environmental issues, had nothing to say about
this most
widespread risk in
Nearly two years
after the catastrophe, Miscellany
At the start of the
19th century, the French Mining Code laid down basic regulations that
can be
described as sustainable development, even though this phrase was not
in use at
the time. Evidence of this is the number of mining codes around the
world that
have (some recently) adopted principles from it. A concern for
efficiency, good
management and the general interest prevailed in drafting the Mining
Code, but
the level of technology and knowledge limited what could actually be
implemented.
Water is not
“territorial”. Man-made boundaries cannot contain this polymorphous,
labile and
vital liquid. How can a region deal with this flowing reality, which
shapes it
but can never be assigned to or identified with it? How to draw up a
water
policy that will not fall short because it overlooks how water
circulates — a
policy that, on the contrary, can find the grounds for its success in
this
circulation? The sustainability of a region’s development depends on
the relation
to water.
The EU directive
that has established a framework for a common water policy has come as
a
surprise to the French owing to its requirements and scope. The
requirement to
set, justify and reach objectives for recycling all sorts of water
weighs on
the executive branch of government. The objective of recycling water
seems even
more demanding since no funds have been appropriated to the few parties
actually involved. This directive exemplifies the originality of the
model of
EU integration with its obligation of performance. How does this
integration
shape the contents and assessment of actual policies?
Public policies
must now address the issue of how to make human development
sustainable. A key
is the “integrated” assessments for taking into account questions
related to
both human development and the preservation of biodiversity, as well as
interactions between the two. Their complexity calls for original,
participatory methods and new tools for decision-making. A role-playing
experiment conducted in
Decisions, public
as well as private, in risk-management hardly inspire confidence in the
general
public. For this reason, new procedures have been drawn up for bringing
together various parties in drafting decisions — whether about
radioactive
wastes, pesticides used by farmers, genetically modified organisms or
nanotechnology. What lessons to draw from these experiments? Do the
decisions
made tap the full potential of research and allow all the time need for
public
hearings? Emphasis has been laid on defining procedures step by step
and on
clarifying the roles of various, public and private, parties so that
the
majority of citizens accept a decision as being credible. |
|
|