LES ANNALES DES MINES
Gérer & Comprendre n°83 March 2006
FOR OUR
ENGLISH-SPEAKING
READERS
|
TESTIFYING
André
Bergeron interviewed by Bernard Colasse and Francis Pavé Holding
a union card since he was fourteen years and twenty days(!) old,
André
Bergeron, secretary general of Force Ouvrière from 1963
to 1989, was the
“best liked labor union leader in
Francis
Ginsbourger
Corinne
Grenier Health
networks form for the purpose of providing innovative responses to
poorly known
or complicated pathologies. They give rise to new ways of organizing
group
actions around patients: decompartmentalize health professions, boost
cooperation, place the patient at the center of concern, look for
supplementary
resources, circulate knowledge, improve quality, reduce costs… But this
slow,
tricky process starts out with an informal period when parties
gradually define
the reasons for forming a group and draw up the first procedures for
collectively working together. Few initiatives move beyond this
critical phase
of improving interpersonal relationships, which is never neutral. It
involves
redefining “occupational territories” and necessitates a managerial
approach,
to which health professionals are seldom accustomed. Through a study of
how the
RPM Network (Réseau Pôle Mémoire) was set up, we
see the extent to which a
discussion of cases promoted the learning of new methods of
coordination in
line with the specific characteristics of the organizations involved.
Nathalie
Darene and François Romon Innovation,
in particular the launching of new products, is now an essential
condition for
companies to survive and grow. Since launching a new product costs ever
more, a
firm needs to imagine its future customers and their needs — it
might even
need to create the customers in order to reduce risks so that a new
product
meets with success. How does marketing enter into this “construction”
of an
innovative product ? What methods does it use to form valid ideas about
future
customers ? How does it follow the iterations of the innovation
process, from
the emergence of a project to its implementation and the decision to
launch a
new product?
|
MOSAICS Frédérique
PALLEZ: Don’t tell
my mother I’m on assignment: On Gilles Jeannot’s Les métiers
flous: Travail
et action publique (Toulouse : Éditions Octares 2005). Jean-Marc WELLER: Justice
in
person: On Alexandre Mathieu-Fritz’s, Les huissiers de justice
(Paris: Presses Universitaires de France 2005). Alexandra BIDET: The
manager
and the shop: On Yves Cohen’s Organiser à l’aube du
taylorisme. La pratique
d’Ernest Mattern chez Peugeot, 1906-1919 (Besançon:
Presses
Universitaires Franc-Comtoises 2001). Michel VILLETTE: Leaving
a
mark: On Jean-Claude Thoenig and Charles Waldman’s De l’entreprise
marchande
à l’entreprise marquante (Paris: Éditions
d’Organisation 2005) TRIAL BY FACT
Anne
Dreyer, Aurélie Jammet and Romain Delmas The
French railway system (SNCF) launched a new concept for traveling by
high-speed
train (TGV) in late 2004: iDTGV might be its first concrete outcome of
an innovation.
Based on two major successes in the firm (the TGV and online ticket
sales),
iDTGV apparently stems from a determination to anticipate market trends
by
creating “something new”. However this modernization could not be
undertaken as
in a private company. The SNCF had to set up a subsidiary in order to
obtain
the necessary flexibility and freedom of action. Thus freed from the
stranglehold of regulations, it could focus on users’ actual
expectations while
conducting tests with TGV carriages. A question has been left hanging
that
labor organizations asked at the start: does iDTGV threaten the public
rail
utility or undermine its underlying principles? OVERLOOKED…
Jean-Pierre
Brechet, Nathalie
Schieb-Bienfait and Caroline Urbain À
historical background is
provided for analyzing the supply and demand of home services for the
elderly.
The formation of this supply and demand is interpreted as resulting
from a
mixture of regulations at the initiative of several parties with
various
purposes and plans: denominational organizations, nonprofits in the
“social
economy”, public organizations and (more recently and to a much lesser
extent)
for-profit companies. These parties’ plans lay the groundwork for the
activities and regulations that shape competition. This leads us to
inquire
into the theoretical scope of taking these plans into account when we
analyze
collective actions and competitive phenomena.
|
|
|