LES ANNALES DES MINES
Responsabilité
& Environnement n°48 October
2007
FOR OUR
ENGLISH-SPEAKING
READERS
|
Environment seen by
Social Sciences,
Stéphane Frioux What the
interdepartmental undersecretary of sustainable development expects
from the
social sciences What contribution can the social sciences make to sustainable development ? A decisive one if they prove capable of handling the essential questions raised by this new concept and, above all, of designing the tools necessary for a thoroughgoing change in society. The paradigms at issue shape the deepest layers of our society, whence the need to avoid being dragged down into vain debates. Sustainable development calls for a change of civilization since it transforms the relations between humanity and the biosphere, and does away with the boundaries between scientists and lay persons, between “soft” and “hard” sciences, between sure and uncertain knowledge. No surprise that conservativisms are mobilizing against it with the most powerful force in the world : intellectual inertia!
Far from the
environment of naturalists who mainly study plant- and wildlife, the
geographer’s environment is a web of relations and interactions between
nature
and society, or nature and culture. It is a subject that
brings together social and “natural” data into a “hybrid” construct. It
represents a major change from early 20th-century physical geography,
which
assigned a fundamental place to the “milieu”. Biophysical factors are
not
rejected but integrated from a different approach. For geographers, the
environment is “given”, perceived, experienced and managed; it is a
political
issue with a natural place in the perspective of sustainable
development.
Although
geographers and historians share the same definition of what
“environment”
means, these two disciplines are not advancing at the same pace. In
During the 1960s,
the environment forced its way into economic theory. Economics
responded with
two epistemological positions : on the one hand, an “economics of
the
environment” and, on the other, an “ecological economics”. For the
former, the
environmental crisis is a period of transition, the environment having
future
prospects as an economic good (though a still imperfect one) like any
other. In
brief, the environment is fit into economic rationality and the ideal
of the
marketplace. For the second approach, the environmental crisis is a
symptom
that a threshold has been crossed and a new era of scarcity of our
“natural
capital” is now beginning. Accordingly, economics must take ecological
rules
and regulations into account; and economic rationality must make room
for
rationales that cannot be reduced to it and, in fact, have a much
broader
scope.
The environment has
become an endlessly expanding area of new information with : ever
more
legal obligations to inform, the development and delivery of more and
more
information, and the production and publication of exhaustive, unranked
information accessible by everyone everywhere. The environment is an
issue that
allows for experimenting with new forms of dialog and debate with
public
hearings where new actors (watchful citizens) and a contemporary ideal
of
democracy are emerging. There is a major difficulty however : how
to deal
with complex issues while adhering to the principle of making messages
intelligible and accessible, while introducing certainty in uncertain
fields of
knowledge, and while stimulating changes in behavior patterns without
creating
a blockage or disruption ? From words to deeds André Micoud Sustainable
development is inextricably a rhetorical figure of speech, a rational
concept
and a legal category that, altogether, involve designing and
“instituting”
another world. It calls for reconsidering how “natural” a whole series
of
figures, ideas and notions are even though they have become
“ready-to-think”
categories increasingly heterogeneous with regard to the now observable
symbolic construction that institutes not only another world but also
other
human beings — whence the “remaking” of the social sciences that we are
now
witnessing. This also accounts for the surge in the anthropology of
Western
societies, which academics have started studying like ethnologists used
to
study precolonial primitive societies.
Franck-Dominique
Vivien Twenty-five years
after it was launched and despite apparent unanimity, sustainable
development
is still an “underexploited innovation” owing to the difficulty of
grasping its
essence and assigning it a precise content in terms of objectives or
principles
for enabling decision-making and action. For this reason, issues are
dealt with
by simply juxtaposing, or “pasting”, measures, actions and policies —
with
little originality and even less coherence. |
For urban
redevelopment : Managing an industrial legacy and inequality in
Seine-Saint-Denis Department, As a symbol of the The chemical
industry and its neighbors, an ambivalent relationship : The
greater “Risk” is a hybrid
notion, an ambiguous word; it is not well defined or accurately
calculated once
and for all. It is, in fact, relational. Understanding residents’
relations
with next-door industries keeps us from adopting the much too narrow
viewpoint
of the professionals in charge of the technical and administrative
management
of industrial risks. The relations of “neighbors” to their industrial —
but
also physical, human and social — environment are not static. Instead
of being
defined once and for all by simple parameters, they are continuously
adjusted
to everyday micro-events. This gives rise to an ongoing interpretation
and
face-to-face relationships that require meaning. The neighbors of the
chemical
industry in
Was the relation of the monastic orders
to their natural environment an example of sustainable development, or
is it an
anachronism ? Without trying to delimit a contemporary topic by
circumscribing
a quite different area of history and thus risking that the scientific
relevance of such an approach not be validated, we might, nonetheless,
adopt
sustainable development as a guide for thinking about the relations
between
societies in the past and their environment. In the French Alps, the
Grande
Chartreuse’s management of its forests evinced a concern for
sustainable development.
Woodlands were worked for the profit of the Carthusian monastery while
opening
access to this vital resource to peasants and conserving the forest and
its
resources. It would probably be more appropriate to
talk about a sustainable management “like a good father’s”. This
heritage has
come down through the centuries : the same districts are now being
worked
as during the 16th century.
Farming the sea and
watercourses in response to an increasing scarcity of fish, “sowing
fish in the
sea like seeds in a field”… a clearing was made for the development of
fish-farming during the second half of the 18th century; but the
“aquatic
revolution” actually occurred during the 19th century. In
At the very end of
the 19th and the start of the 20th centuries, fishing enthusiasts
formed
several associations that expressed concern for the environment. These
nonprofit organizations have mainly sought to preserve French
watercourses and
stock them with fish. In the quest to find the causes of problems, they
have
criticized industrial pollution, mapped and inventoried fish
populations,
interacted with scientific organizations, and undertook vast operations
in
fish-farming and hatcheries. Fishing enthusiasts have been mobilized
throughout
Water, a source of
wealth and an economic good to be worked in the interests of humanity,
must
come under ever more effective technical and technological control.
“Appropriation”, “profitability” and “development” were the key words
in water
policies till the 1970s. Once a concern for the environment and
questions about
the impact of global warming arose, this exhaustible source of wealth
was
perceived as being menaced. It has become a natural resource that human
activities have jeopardized for a long time but that a sense of
responsibility
for future generations leads us to preserve or even restore. By
definitively
placing the concepts of “wealth”, “heritage” and “water resources” at
the
center of “sustainable management” in major legal texts, we might make
two
visions compatible that have diverged for so long now. The
untenable
sustainability of scientific practices ? When sustainable development
questions
the social sciences and society
Yann Calbérac |
|
|